Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided February 11, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00795Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-0795-SPM v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., EVANSVILLE WESTERN RAILWAY, INC., AND PADUCAH & LOUISVILLE RAILWAY, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER McGLYNN, District Judge: Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by defendant Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. (“PAL”) (Doc. 243). Having been fully informed of the issues presented, this Court GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.