Legal Opinion
United States v. Dean William Cotnam and Phillip Zadurski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-2943, 95-3137PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Dean William Cotnam pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute LSD. His plea was conditioned on the allowance of this appeal to challenge the district court’s partial denial of his motion to suppress and the determination of his sentence. Phillip Zadurski was convicted by a jury of 1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute LSD, 2) possession with intent to distribute LSD, and 3) possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He appeals the LSD convictions, claiming that prosecutorial misconduct, particularly remarks that implicitly commented…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Paul Burritt v. Lisa DitlefsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Wieslaw MietusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Otis L. McClellan and John D. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael D. Andreas and Terrance S. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.