Legal Opinion

Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 24, 2015No. 09-17339, 11-15030PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge FRIEDLAND; Concurrence by Judge IKUTA.

OPINION

FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:

After a jury in California Superior Court convicted them each of murder, Robert McDaniels and Keelon Jenkins challenged their convictions in the California Court of Appeal. McDaniels and Jenkins argued that the prosecution had made racially motivated peremptory strikes during pre-trial jury selection. They did not, however, move to place the entire record of voir dire before the California Court of Appeal, nor did they ask that court to perform a comprehensive comparative juror analysis. The California…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Ozzie Batchelor v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, James Redden, Solicitor General, Walter L. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Joe Smith v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Sifuentes v. BrazeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Geremy AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API