Legal Opinion
Sifuentes v. Brazelton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 18, 2016No. 13-17603PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 18, 2016, and published at 815 F.3d 490, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 511, in the first full paragraph, remove the following sentence: <Even when a prosecutor relies on one impermissible reason for striking a juror, there is no Batson violation if “[t]he prosecutor provided a number of other permissible and plausible race-neutral reasons.” Collins, 546 U.S. at 340-41, 126 S.Ct. 969. >.
With these amendments, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. Judge O’Scannlain and Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wade Robertson v. Rise PichonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ervine Davenport v. Duncan MacLarenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- John Sansing v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Charles Stevens v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Anthony Oliver v. Ronald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.