Legal Opinion

Buck v. Desvignes

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 27, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 9016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Desvignes. The sole issue is Desvignes’ right to make count 2. We affirm.

Buck et al. (Buck) filed no preliminary statement and are limited to the filing date of December 29, 1966, of Patent No. 3,403,284. Desvignes copied the count from the Buck patent into an application to reissue patent No. 3,322,955 which was awarded a convention date of December 24, 1959. The question is whether Desvignes' disclosure supports the count. On Buck’s motion to dissolve on the ground Desvignes had no right…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Sherman Smith v. Charles Emory WehnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Walter H. Wirkler v. Corles M. Perkins and Alfred BennettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Martin v. FriendlyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Hunt v. TreppschuhCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. Grasselli v. DewingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. Holmes v. KellyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API