Legal Opinion

Operations Management International, Inc. v. Tengasco, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 3, 1999No. 3:98-cv-00269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURRIAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The motion of Operations Management International, Inc. (“OMI”) for summary judgment has been referred to the undersigned for disposition pursuant to the consent of the parties and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and the Rules of this Court [Docs. 13, 24]. The defendant, Tengasco, Inc. (“Tengaseo”), filed a written response in opposition to the motion [Doc.' 19]. OMI has filed a reply to defendant’s response [Doc. 21]. This matter was argued before the undersigned on January 26, 1999.

I. Introduction

OMI moves for summary judgment in its favor on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ATS Southeast, Inc. v. Carrier Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sparton Technology, Inc. v. Util-Link, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Tennessee Medical Ass'n v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  4. Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Wesley Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API