Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 7, 1985No. Crim. 83-00103-RPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WARRINER, District Judge.

Defendant Thomas K. Williams has moved the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) for a finding as to allegations of factual inaccuracies “in the presentence investigation report or the summary of the report or part thereof.”

I believe subsection (D) is intended to require findings from the bench prior to sentencing. Subsection (ii) thereof clearly indicates that contentions with respect to inaccuracies in the presentence report are to be dealt with and disposed of before the Court imposes sentence. This requirement serves the double purpose of requiring the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose AlemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Anthony E. UrsilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Allan FischerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Stephen Larned EngsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Joseph Giaimo, MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API