Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen Larned Engs

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1989No. 89-1051PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

Stephen L. Engs, a federal prisoner sentenced in 1983 for escape and check counterfeiting, filed a pro se motion to correct his presentence investigation report, purportedly under Rule 32(c)(3)(D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The district court denied his motion as untimely and beyond the jurisdiction of the court. This appeal followed. Based on our conclusion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear a postsentence motion based solely on Rule 32, we affirm.

I

Engs pleaded guilty to escape from custody and to counterfeiting cashier checks with intent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Donald E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Juan Jose VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Bill D. Maddox v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Jeffrey Allan FischerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Scott A. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. David HootenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Robert S. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Francis Guerra PleitezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API