Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Aleman
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 16, 1987No. 86-5784PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:
In this case this Court must consider what is necessary to trigger the operation of the procedures set out in Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). Because we conclude that defendant in this case advanced no proper and sufficient allegation of factual inaccuracy with respect to his presentence investigation report, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Defendant Aleman was indicted on two counts involving violations of federal law relating to controlled substances. In accordance with the terms of a plea agreement, he subsequently pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland AttawayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Dennis D. RoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Samuel PettyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Walter MaysCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Richard J. CarmelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Carl BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Larry Jarome RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William N. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.