Legal Opinion

Alberto v. Dupont v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1996No. 95-1714PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Alberto DuPont appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. We affirm.

I

Petitioner-appellant Alberto DuPont (“DuPont”) was charged with one count of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine (in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846), and one count of possessing with intent to distribute approximately two kilograms of cocaine (in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841). On October 22, 1991, the jury found DuPont guilty of possessing the two kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute, but was unable to reach a verdict on the conspiracy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Danilo Baro (92-1501 93-1250) and Ramon Baro (92-1502 93-1250)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Blankenship (Clyde Virgil, Bradley) v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Norberto Giraldo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. LinderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. Kevin Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Rodriguez v. Bureau of CorrectionsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  4. In Re BraddyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  5. Sherman Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API