Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Clayton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 17, 1991PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This is an action in ejectment concerning 265 acres of land in Houston County. The trial judge granted summary judgment to the defendants, holding (1) that they had paid the taxes on the land for more than twenty years and the plaintiff had not, (2) that the plaintiff was guilty of laches, and (3) that the defendants had adversely possessed the property for more than seven years under recorded assurances of title. We affirm the trial judge’s application of the defense of laches but hold that the record does not conclusively show who paid the taxes in the twenty year…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Carpenter v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Samuel v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Osborne v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re the Estate of DarwinTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Dennis Joslin Co., LLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Baptist Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. And Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee, Inc. v. Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Sutton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API