Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Clarkin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 2012No. Nos. A10-1286, A11-0548Published

1ConcurrenceMeyer, Justice

Although I concur with the result reached by the court, I disagree with the majority’s legal test for awarding jail credit only in the instances in which the State has completed its investigation and has both probable cause and sufficient evidence to prosecute its case against the defendant with a reasonable likelihood of actual conviction. Instead, I would adopt the court of appeals’ probable cause test as outlined in State v. Fritzke, 521 N.W.2d 859, 861-62 (Minn.App.1994), and conclude that jail credit is awarded for time spent in custody, including time spent in custody on unrelated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Asfaha v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. FolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API