Legal Opinion

Mayock v. Splane

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1943No. Civ. 13645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $53,822.50 alleged to be the reasonable value for legal services rendered by respondents to appellant during the period from March 3, 1939 to September 26, 1941, together with the sum of $2,119.73, an alleged balance due on account of expenses and funds advanced by respondents in connection with the performance of said legal services.

Appellant, by her corporate guardian, denied liability for lack of information or belief and pleaded the statute of limitations as a bar to the action. The matter was brought to trial and on December 8, 1941, respondents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gorman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Griffiths v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Matthiesen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biaggi v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Crocker v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Douillard v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API