Legal Opinion
CINCINNATI & C. RY. CO. v. Inter. Com. Com'n
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 13, 1907No. 201PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
206 U.S. 142 (1907)
CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION.
No. 201.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 31, 1907.
February 1, 1907.
Decided May 13, 1907.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., and Mr. Edward Colston for appellants.
Mr. L.A. Shaver and Mr. P.J. Farrell for appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
Official Classification territory embraces that portion of the United States lying between Canada on the north, the Atlantic Ocean on the east, the Potomac and Ohio Rivers on the south and the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BehlmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cin., NO & Tex. Pac. Railway v. Int. Com. Com.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
4Cited by11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Dart Transit Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Pub. S. Com. v. N.C. Rwy. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Public Service Commission v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.