Legal Opinion
People v. Farrow
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*711OPINION OF THE COURT
Leon Ruchelsman, J.
Defendants are charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). Defendants now move to suppress the drugs and drug vials found during a search on the grounds that the consent to search was invalid and that in any event the officers exceeded the scope of the consent. A hearing was held before this court and Police Officer Dragonetti testified for the People and defendant Bedeau testified for the defense. This court finds their testimonies credible to the extent indicated.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On September…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pueblo v. Ortiz RodriguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- Pueblo v. Ortiz RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999