Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1996No. 96-1266PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

• Appellant, David Hughes, advised his client to ignore a district associate judge’s orders that Hughes’ client undergo a substance abuse evaluation. This disciplinary action followed. Despite Hughes’ sincere belief that the court’s orders were beyond its authority, we conclude his conduct violated the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7~106(A). We publicly reprimand him for this violation.

I. Background Facts and Procedural History. Hughes has practiced law for twenty-six years and is currently in private practice in Cascade, Iowa. He has no prior ethical violations and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Lutz v. DarbyshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Judy Chapman, T. Dolores Butler, Leslie Ann Jassman, Deborah Halvonik v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Phillips v. Iowa District Court for Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MulfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. JaySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LesyshenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API