Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
• Appellant, David Hughes, advised his client to ignore a district associate judge’s orders that Hughes’ client undergo a substance abuse evaluation. This disciplinary action followed. Despite Hughes’ sincere belief that the court’s orders were beyond its authority, we conclude his conduct violated the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7~106(A). We publicly reprimand him for this violation.
I. Background Facts and Procedural History. Hughes has practiced law for twenty-six years and is currently in private practice in Cascade, Iowa. He has no prior ethical violations and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Lutz v. DarbyshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Judy Chapman, T. Dolores Butler, Leslie Ann Jassman, Deborah Halvonik v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Phillips v. Iowa District Court for Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MulfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. JaySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LesyshenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.