Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Chief Judge.
In this appeal, we decide that The Circle K Corporation (Circle K) 1 is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees from the City of Phoenix under A.R.S. § 12-2030. The undisputed facts are as follows.
In early June 1988, Circle K applied to the city for a beer and wine permit. On June 30, the permit was denied by the city’s zoning administrator. Circle K appealed to the board of adjustment, which granted the permit on September 1. On September 8, the board’s decision was appealed to the city council. It conducted a de novo review on November 2, 1988, and reversed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- U.S. Parking Systems v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Book Cellar, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of BensonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.