Legal Opinion

Circle K Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 30, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 90-0097PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Chief Judge.

In this appeal, we decide that The Circle K Corporation (Circle K) 1 is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees from the City of Phoenix under A.R.S. § 12-2030. The undisputed facts are as follows.

In early June 1988, Circle K applied to the city for a beer and wine permit. On June 30, the permit was denied by the city’s zoning administrator. Circle K appealed to the board of adjustment, which granted the permit on September 1. On September 8, the board’s decision was appealed to the city council. It conducted a de novo review on November 2, 1988, and reversed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. U.S. Parking Systems v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Book Cellar, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Stagecoach Trails MHC, L.L.C. v. City of BensonArizona Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API