Pohl v. Pohl, Unpublished Decision (7-16-2004)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Sharron M. Pohl appeals from an order dismissing her motion for contempt against defendant-appellee Robert J. Pohl and ordering Robert to pay Sharron $12,681.67, her share of his retirement benefits, pursuant to their separation agreement. Sharron contends that the trial court abused its discretion in its calculation of her share of Robert's retirement benefits, because it failed to use the coverture fraction analysis articulated in Hoyt v. Hoyt (1990),53 Ohio St.3d 177, 559 N.E.2d 1292, which would result in her receiving $89,695.70 of Robert's retirement…