Hoyt v. Hoyt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
This court is presented with an opportunity to develop guidelines for a trial court to follow when exercising its discretion in considering pension or retirement benefits in a divorce. The general rule is that pension or retirement benefits earned during the course of a marriage are marital assets3 and a factor to be considered not only in the division of property,4 but also in relationship to an *179award of alimony.* ***5 However, general rules cannot provide for every contingency and no specific rule can apply in every case.6 The purpose of the guidelines is to provide a fair and equitable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Berish v. BerishOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Koegel v. KoegelOhio Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In Re Robert C. McCafferty Debtor. Robert C. McCafferty v. Marion McCaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ostanek v. Ostanek (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Erb v. ErbOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Neville v. NevilleOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re HagemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.