Legal Opinion
United States v. Everstone
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided June 23, 1988No. ACM 26756PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
En Banc.
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
In United States v. Bonnet, 17 M.J. 968 (A.F.C.M.R. 1984), and United States v. *796Smith, 17 M.J. 1089 (A.F.C.M.R. 1984), we held that the failure of the appellant to raise multiplicity for sentence does not waive the issue on appeal. The time has come to reexamine this position.
In the case before us the appellant entered a guilty plea to desertion, absence without leave, fraudulent enlistment, and escape from confinement. For the first time on appeal, the appellant contends that the absence without leave and the escape from confinement allegations are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. WheatcraftU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. CheathamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. LloydUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. HancockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. McCoyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. MedleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.