United States v. Jones
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
On 18 December 1986, the appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to violating paragraphs 3f and 3h of USCINCPAC REP PHIL INSTRUCTION 4066.7Q, 4 April 1986,1 by transferring duty free goods, i.e., a motor vehicle, to an unauthorized person and by failing to show possession or authorized disposition of tax-exempt motor vehicles. Directives of this type are generally referred to as “show and tell” regulations.
In our initial review, we considered a single assigned error, raised for the first time on appeal, wherein the appellant claimed that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. EverstoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.