Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 21, 1988No. ACM 25904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

On 18 December 1986, the appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to violating paragraphs 3f and 3h of USCINCPAC REP PHIL INSTRUCTION 4066.7Q, 4 April 1986,1 by transferring duty free goods, i.e., a motor vehicle, to an unauthorized person and by failing to show possession or authorized disposition of tax-exempt motor vehicles. Directives of this type are generally referred to as “show and tell” regulations.

In our initial review, we considered a single assigned error, raised for the first time on appeal, wherein the appellant claimed that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. EverstoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API