Legal Opinion
City Commission of Piqua v. Piqua Daily Call
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 1979No. 78 CA-35PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, P. J.
This case was initiated by plaintiff-appellee, the City Commission of the City of Piqua (hereinafter “City Commission”), against defendant-appellant, the Piqua Daily Call, for a declaratory judgment to resolve a controversy regarding application of the city charter and R. C. 121.22, as amended in 1975, known as the “Sunshine Law,” to an executive meeting of the City Commission. Piqua Daily Call responded and filed a counterclaim demanding an injunction and rescission of all municipal resolutions and ordinances that resulted from executive meetings held in violation of either R. C. 121.22 or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Dayton Newspaper, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. MischLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hills & Dales, Inc. v. City of WoosterOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kanter v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017