Hills & Dales, Inc. v. City of Wooster
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBell, P.J.
The instant case originated as a declaratory judgment action commenced by appellant, Hills & Dales, Inc. Hills & Dales sought a declaration that the city of Wooster’s new zoning code was invalid in that it had been enacted in violation of Ohio’s “Sunshine Law,” the city charter, and city ordinances.
The factual basis for the complaint is as follows:
On September 20, 1979, after having held six meetings open to the public during the previous month on the issue of the proposed revision of the zoning code, the - city planning commission held a private work session to which certain members of city…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Matheny v. Frontier Local Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Dies Electric Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Kanter v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Bond v. City of MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State ex rel. Branch v. Pitts, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986