Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Lansing State Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1903No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by John R. Gordon against the Lansing State Savings Bank to recover the balance of a deposit. Eróm a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case was tried by the circuit judge without a jury. At the request of the defendant, he made a finding of facts, which is as follows:

“Monday morning, December 9,1901, at about 9 o’clock, there was presented at the bank of defendant at the city •of Lansing for payment the following check, made-upon the printed form of check supplied by defendant to its patrons, and signed by plaintiff, viz.:
“‘Lansing, Mich.,____190.. No.....
“‘Lansing State Savings Bank oe Lansing.
“ ‘Pay to the order of..................................................1.......................... Nine Hundred and Seventy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. McIntosh v. LytleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  4. Prewitt v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  5. Rush & Bros. v. HaggardTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chase v. AinsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API