Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Lansing State Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1903No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by John R. Gordon against the Lansing State Savings Bank to recover the balance of a deposit. Eróm a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case was tried by the circuit judge without a jury. At the request of the defendant, he made a finding of facts, which is as follows:
“Monday morning, December 9,1901, at about 9 o’clock, there was presented at the bank of defendant at the city •of Lansing for payment the following check, made-upon the printed form of check supplied by defendant to its patrons, and signed by plaintiff, viz.:
“‘Lansing, Mich.,____190.. No.....
“‘Lansing State Savings Bank oe Lansing.
“ ‘Pay to the order of..................................................1.......................... Nine Hundred and Seventy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harding v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- McIntosh v. LytleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Prewitt v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Rush & Bros. v. HaggardTexas Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Chase v. AinsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1903