Commonwealth v. Wilson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this opinion, we are called upon to determine whether a suspect’s acts of twice alighting from a vehicle in a neighborhood known for a high degree of drug-related activity constitutes sufficient facts to justify a subsequent warrantless investigative stop of the vehicle by police under Terry v. Ohio. 1 We hold that the facts as found by the suppression court do not support the conclusion that the police had a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to warrant the investigative stop. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of sentence entered by the trial court, and remand for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. AyalaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FeltySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.