Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion, we are called upon to determine whether a suspect’s acts of twice alighting from a vehicle in a neighborhood known for a high degree of drug-related activity constitutes sufficient facts to justify a subsequent warrantless investigative stop of the vehicle by police under Terry v. Ohio. 1 We hold that the facts as found by the suppression court do not support the conclusion that the police had a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to warrant the investigative stop. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of sentence entered by the trial court, and remand for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. AyalaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. FeltySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API