Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Ayala
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 6, 2002PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PER CURIAM:
¶ 1 Appellant, Hector Luis Ayala, appeals from his judgment of sentence entered following his conviction for possession of a controlled substance (cocaine). 1 After review, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.
¶ 2 The facts of the case, which are not in dispute, as they have been gleaned from the trial court’s opinion and the certified record in this matter are as follows: On July 14, 2000, at 7:56 a.m. in the City of York, Officer Blymire of the York City Police Department received a call from his dispatcher which related that an anonymous…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ElmobdySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PrattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.