Legal Opinion

Laczko v. Jules Meyers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1969No. Civ. 33754PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

used Cadillac from respondent. Its odometer then read 34,000 mil^s. About two months later appellant discovered that the car '.had been driven over 55,000 miles at the time respondent purchased it. This action for damages for fraud followed. The appeal is from an order dismissing the action under Code of Civil Procedure section 581, subdivision 3, following the sustaining of a general demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellant’s second amended complaint.

The basis of the demurrer was that the appellant’s complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wetherton v. Growers Farm Labor Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Hudson v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Crusader Ins. Co. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. ANGIE M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Joseph v. JJ Mac Intyre Companies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  5. Michael R. v. Jeffrey B.California Court of Appeal · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API