Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Frank

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1994No. 20482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Bruce Olsen, doing business as Olsen Brothers Construction, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees and costs in an action for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien against Frank and Gail Rowe. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand to the district court to make an appropriate award of fees and costs.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

This case arises out of a dispute concerning construction work that Olsen performed for the Rowes. In the fall of 1990, the parties entered into an agreement whereby Olsen was to construct certain improvements on property…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. DeWils Interiors, Inc. v. DinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dawson v. EldredgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fairfax v. RamirezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bouten Construction Co. v. M & L Land Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API