Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Affidavit of illegality. Before Judge Hart. Putnam superior court. March term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

'Simmons, C. J.

1. Complaint is made in the motion for a new trial that “certain letters, six in number, were illegally admitted to the jury, over objection of counsel” that there had been no sufficient proof of their execution, the same having been “offered as letters from the defendant to the plaintiff.” None of these letters are set forth in the motion nor the contents thereof stated, the movant simply making the above-quoted reference thereto, and adding that “they have been briefed and will appear in the brief of the evidence filed with this motion, and marked and identified as letters 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. American Car Co. v. Atlanta Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Harder v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Edison General Electric Co. v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alabama Construction Co. v. Continental Car & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. McDowell v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Georgia & Florida Railway v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Burton & Class v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API