Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Gould

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1928No. 6402PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Strict technical pleadings are not required in a habeas; eorpus proceeding, between rival contestants for custody of a minor child. Wilkinson v. Lee, 138 Ga. 360 (75 S. E. 477, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1013). Where a writ has been issued and in response thereto the child has been brought into court, the better practice is to inquire into the evidence necessary to a proper decision of the case, unless the petition alleges facts which show affirmatively as a matter of law that the respondent is entitled to the custody of the child. Where the petition is of such character, a general demurrer will…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Taylor v. JeterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
  4. Brandon v. BrandonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Wilkinson v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Willingham v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. In Re Adoption of PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API