Legal Opinion

S. H. & J. Drilling Corp. v. Qualls

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1980No. 79-326PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant, a driller of oil and gas wells, purchased various items from outside the state to replace existing items of a drilling rig, which is used in its drilling operations in Arkansas. Appellee assessed the Arkansas Compensating Tax, commonly referred to as the “use” tax, on the items pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-3105 (Supp. 1977). Appellant contended that the items are exempt under the “replacement” exemption in Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-3106 (D)(2)(b) (Supp. 1977) and paid the tax under protest. Following a hearing, appellee’s hearing board found that several of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Beverage Company v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Heath v. Westark Poultry Processing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Heath v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Fourco Glass Co. v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ragland v. Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Ragland v. DumasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Ragland v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Agape Church, Inc. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. C & C Machinery, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API