Legal Opinion

Ridgway v. Grace

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 6, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by James Ridgway against William R. Grace, Horace J. Moody, and Charles R. Flint. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

As the case does not purport to contain all the evidence, we are confined, on this appeal, to a review of errors of law by the trial court. Meislahn v. Englehard, 20 N. Y. Supp. 900, (recently decided.) Stating the case in the aspect most favorable to the appellant, it is that G. W. Smith & Co., having a judgment against J. P. O’Sullivan, as drawer of an unaccepted bill of exchange, assigned the draft and judgment to the appellant; that the appellant applied to the respondents to reserve out of a fund of O’Sullivan’s, coming into their hands as his agents, sufficient money to pay the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Porter v. . WormserNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Ackley v. . ParmenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Wells v. . MonihanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Meislahn v. EnglehardCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amend v. BeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
  2. Denver Pressed Brick Co. v. LeFevreColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Denver Pressed Brick Co. v. LeFevreColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Siegel v. Spear & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API