Legal Opinion

Meislahn v. Englehard

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from judgment entered against them on verdict rendered by jury and from order denying new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

There are no exceptions by appellant, except to the denial of motion to nonsuit at close of plaintiff’s case, and to dismiss on the merits after defendants had rested, and the case does not contain a certificate that it contains all the evidence, and so it follows that if the evidence and the legal inferences therefrom are sufficient to carry the case to the jury, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed. This action is to recover a brokerage of five per cent for causing the sale of defendant’s saloon for $15,750. It was conceded that plaintiff was entitled to this commission *413of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ridgway v. GraceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API