Legal Opinion
Amend v. Becker
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant Mishkin, upon the verdict of a jury. Action upon a promissory note. The material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtQ-iegerich, J.
The defendants, doing business under the firm name of Becker & Mishkin, made the following promissory note:
iC $33 00/100 Mew York, April 1st, 1897.
“ Thirty-five months after date we promise to.pay to the order of Ed. B. Amend Thirty-three 00/100 Dollars with interest at 6/ per annum at 214 Delancey Street, Mew York City. “ Value received.
“ Becker & Mishkin.”
and indorsed as follows:
“ Aaron Becker “ Isaac Mishkin.”
The note was one of a series aggregating upwards of $2,000.
The pleadings were in writing. The complaint alleged the making of the note, the individual indorsement thereof by each of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Trustees of Hamilton College v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Luddington v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Stewart v. Trustees of Hamilton CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- Hanks v. GerbrachtNew York Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blain v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926