Legal Opinion

SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL COMPANY v. Tisdale

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1961No. 38892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

This appeal is by the Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company from a judgment in favor of J. L. Tisdale for damages to land of plaintiff caused by pollution of fresh water stratum underlying said land.

The defendant Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company first contends that the trial court erred in overruling its demurrer to the evidence and motion for instructed verdict.

In support of its contention defendant argues that the evidence adduced by the plaintiff was insufficient to show that the defendant was guilty of negligence or want of care in plugging an exploratory well on the premises of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Sheridan Oil Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Elk City v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Maddox v. BridalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Watson v. Great Lakes Pipeline CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Gannon v. Mobil Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Oberg v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API