Legal Opinion

Watson v. Great Lakes Pipeline Company

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1970No. File 10781PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages to their real estate which was platted into lots near the city limits of Sioux Falls. Their claim was that defendants, in operating their pipeline and oil tank storage business near plaintiffs’ premises, had negligently discharged petroleum products in such quantities as to constitute a public nuisance and as a result did contaminate and pollute the waters under plaintiffs’ property. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs from which defendants appeal. Defendants’ argument for reversal is based on the denial of motions…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Shaw v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Yommer v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Jost v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. Fernando E. TylerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. Fajardo v. CammackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fajardo v. CammackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tipton v. City of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API