Legal Opinion

San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Connell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellee instituted this suit to recover damages accruing by the negligence of appellant in failing to send a flagman from a certain train standing on the track at a water station at Buckner’s creek, and warn alppellee by signals so as to prevent the collision between the engine on which appellee was engineer and the rear end of “the standing train. The trial resulted in a verdict for $22,-000, of which $4000, in obedience to a requirement of the court,-was remitted by appellee, and judgment was accordingly entered for $18,000.

We conclude that the jury was justified by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GasscampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co v. GormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. De VoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Carter v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Conner v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API