Legal Opinion
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 3, 1996No. 2:95-cr-00094PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
WINDER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss counts two, three, and five of Plaintiffs The Proctor & Gamble Company’s and The Proctor & Gamble Distributing Company’s second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 1 In addition, Defendant Amway Corporation moved the court to dismiss John Does 1-5. 2 The court held a hearing on the motions on November 6,1996. Before the hearing, the court considered carefully the memoranda and other materials…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Robert Roman v. Cessna Aircraft Company and the Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Nunes v. RushtonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- PurCo Fleet Services, Inc. v. TowersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1999
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. HaugenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
- Jenco, LC, and Dean Gardner Investment, LC v. Valderra Development, LLC, et alDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.