Legal Opinion

The Mary

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 6, 1916No. 3133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel by J. F. McCullough and others against the schooner Mary. On motion to retax costs.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

This is a motion to disallow proctor’s fees on talcing testimony before a court commissioner of 10 witnesses for' libelants and cross-examining three witnesses for claimant, at $2.50 each, a total of $32.50, and also to disallow the per diem of witness Christensen, on the ground that his testimony is immaterial, and to reduce the per diem of witnesses examined before the commissioner to $1.50. This cause was referred to the commissioner to take testimony and report findings and conclusions, on motion of libelant, and thereafter came before the court on exceptions to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Ocampo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  3. United States v. ZerbstDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1953
  4. United States ex rel. Finch v. ElliottDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API