State v. Nettles
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S.'Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
■ Appellant Coran Nettles (“Nettles”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict. The jury convicted Nettles of first-degree murder, first-degree robbery, and two associated counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, Nettles first argues that the trial court erred when it failed to sua sponte disqualify defense counsel due to a conflict of interest. Defense counsel previously represented one of Nettles’s co-defendants who pled guilty and became a material State witness in the case. Nettles also argues that the trial court erred in precluding defense…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DePriest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- State of Missouri v. Maurice Parnell WebberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. McEntireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.