Legal Opinion

State v. McEntire

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2018No. ED 105371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge

Introduction

This case addresses the issue of when a trial court must permit an attorney to withdraw due to a conflict of interest. Appellant Randy L. McEntire's (Defendant) trial counsel, Kevin Chase (Chase), sought to withdraw after discovering that his direct supervisor was representing the confidential informant (CI), who was one of the State's witnesses against Defendant, in an unrelated criminal case in another county. During the one-week time span between the State's disclosure of the name of the CI to Chase and Chase learning that his supervisor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Charles Napper, Jr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. KIMBERLY K. COOK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State of Missouri v. Brandon TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API