Legal Opinion

Hein v. Burns

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided October 10, 1975No. Civ. 73-240-1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Before STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge, HANSON, Chief District Judge, and STUART, District Judge. STUART, District Judge.

This is a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure challenging certain departmental regulations which have the effect of requiring persons who receive a travel allowance under the Federal Government’s Individual Education and Training Plan to pay more for food stamps than they would otherwise, even though all of the travel allowance is spent for the necessary travel. Plaintiff claims that both State and Federal Regulations are inconsistent with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Knebel v. HeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. National Welfare Rights Organization v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Greater New York Hospital Association v. F. David MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. New York v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Dean v. ButzDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API