Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1936No. Crim. 195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment pronounced upon defendant after his conviction of petit theft, with two prior convictions of felonies which he admitted, and from the order denying his motion for new trial.

Defendant was a prospector engaged in mining tailings near the San Joaquin River at Friant in Fresno County, California. L. H. Kahrt was postmaster and conducted a store in Friant at which defendant traded. Kahrt bought gold from miners.

On the evening of May 2, 1936, Kahrt had about $160 in gold in two bottles in a show case in his store. .The gold was last seen by Mrs. Kahrt at about four…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. FrahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. People v. MitsunagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. State v. CristaniSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CabralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API