Legal Opinion

In Re Dunham

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1976No. Crim. 18810PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

This case is a companion to In re Coughlin, ante, page 52 [127 Cal.Rptr. 337, 545 P.2d 249], wherein we hold that the trial court at a probation revocation hearing properly, may consider evidence indicating that the probationer may have committed another criminal offense during the probation period, despite his acquittal of that offense at trial. In the present case, we adopt a similar rule with respect to parole revocation proceedings conducted before the Adult Authority.

In September 1972, petitioner was placed on parole after serving a portion of a prison term for an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re MinnisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API