Legal Opinion

Summerville v. Penn Drilling Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 17, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County; the Hon. Benjamin R. Burroughs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creighton

This was a suit in assumpsit, hy appellees against appellants, in the Circuit Court of Washington’ county, to recover for services performed under a contract for drilling a prospect hole, for coal. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment in favor of appellees for $452, the amount of the verdict, and that each party pay one half the costs.

The contract upon which the suit is based is as follows: “This agreement entered into this 30th day of January, 1903, between C. O. Wilson and J. W. Sweeting, co-partners, doing business under the firm name of Penn Drilling Company of Cairo, Illinois, parties of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Life Ass'n v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. St. Louis National Stock Yards v. GodfreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  3. Traders' Mutual Life Insurance v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ehlen v. O'DonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karris v. Woodstock, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Cusanelli v. SteeleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Karris v. Woodstock, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Merle v. BeifeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API