Legal Opinion · Dissent

Merle v. Beifeld

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,354; Gen. No. 20,364Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edwabd M. Mangan, Judge, presiding.

1Dissent

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

dissenting: I dissent from that part of the foregoing additional opinion that holds that the appellants Joseph Beifeld and Sherman House Hotel Company did not waive the alleged error in that part of the decree which directs that the expenditures and liabilities incurred by the appellee, William F. Merle, in the prosecution of the suit be taxed as costs in the case. I am of the opinion that the said alleged error was waived by the appellants, and I will at a later date file an additional opinion in support of this dissent.

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE SCANLAN DISSENTING…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Trustees of Baptist SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Morton v. PuseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Schumacher v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Gordon v. Commissioners of Highways of Road District No. 3.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Heppes Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API