Panhandle Const. Co. v. Hood
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
The controlling question in this case is the sufficiency to toll the statute of limitations of certain letters passing between appellant and appellees.
The suit was for a balance due upon a paving certificate and to foreclose a paving and mechanic’s lien securing it. The trial was to the court without a jury, and the judgment was in favor of defendants, predicated upon sustaining a plea of limitation.
The certificate matured February 22, 1932, and was therefore barred by the four-year statute of limitations February 22, 1936. Rev.St.1925, art. 5527. The suit was filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neal v. PickettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Tomerlin v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leonard v. EskewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Lanpar Company v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Moutos v. San Saba County Peanut Growers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Haddad v. BagwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.