Legal Opinion

Neal v. Pickett

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1926No. 764-4363PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The judgment of the district court includes findings (supported by evidence) that plaintiffs in error, and those under whom they claim, had and held continuous, peaceable, exclusive, and adverse possession of the land in controversy, and paid taxes thereon, for a period of more than 10 years immediately antecedent filing of the suit. Those findings have not been complained of or challenged by any party to the suit, nor does anything in the opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals (269 S. W. 160) have different import. The deed of February 17, 1906, under which title and right to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GayTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rosenborough v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. Schleicher, Admr. v. GatlinTexas Supreme Court · 1892

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Leonard v. EskewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Alworth v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Kahanek v. KahanekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Maeberry v. Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API