Cooke v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Prohibition. Petitioner seeks to prohibit the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, Department 12 thereof, and the Honorable J. J. Trabucco, judge presiding, from further hearing or determining a proceeding in habeas corpus now pending before said Superior Court, involving the custody of Shirley Cooke, a minor child of the age of five and one-half years.
The facts are as follows: James H. Cooke and Hilda Betty Cooke are husband and wife and are the parents of said Shirley Cooke, all of whom are subjects of Great Britain, and, until…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Coker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Cooper v. . WymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Thornton v. American Writing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cooke v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Bley v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Klement v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937