Legal Opinion

Mehta v. Beaconridge Improvement Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 28, 2011No. 11-1505PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Kirti Mehta sued his homeowners’ association, Beaconridge Improvement Association, its board, and two of its employees, claiming that they discriminated against his family on the basis of their national origin (Indian) by depriving them of services provided to white residents. The district court concluded that his allegations were insufficient to state plausible claims of discrimination or retaliation under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq. Mehta appeals. We vacate in part and remand for further proceedings.

For purposes of this appeal, we accept as true the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deka v. Countryside Ass'n for People with Disabilities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. Robrinzine v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. CASTRO v. LANCASTER LOFTDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
  4. Estate of Jesus Ocasio v. ShillairDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Franklin v. Omaha Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API